How can I establish that my workplace injury was the result of employer negligence?

by Andrew Lind on 15 January, 16

When you have sustained a workplace injury, establishing employer negligence is only necessary when you file a WorkCover common law claim for damages.  Filing a WorkCover statutory compensation claim under the “no-fault” scheme is always the first step in claiming compensation for a work related injury in Queensland. After the statutory compensation claim has been lodged and accepted by WorkCover (or the relevant self-insurer), only then can you file a WorkCover common law claim.

Establishing employer negligence (or liability/fault) is critical to making a WorkCover common law claim for damages as you are not entitled to damages where your employer was not negligent. In order to successfully establish employer negligence, you must satisfy the following elements:

  • That your employer owed you a duty of care;
  • That your employer breached that duty of care; and
  • That the injury you suffered was a result of the breach of duty.

An employer’s duty of care generally extends to ensuring, so far as is reasonably practicable, that the health and safety of their employees (including contractors, sub-contractors, volunteers and labour hire personnel) is not put at risk from work carried out as part of the conduct of the business. This is set out (and elaborated on) in section 19 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld). In addition to setting up safe working environments, the employer’s duty of care also includes properly instructing employees on safe practices in the workplace and how to use machinery and equipment properly.

Establishing that there was a breach of the duty of care is done by proving that the employer failed to do what a reasonable person would have done in the circumstances. Again, it comes back to this question of ‘reasonable foreseeability’ – negligence can usually be established where it should have been reasonably foreseeable by the employer that an injury could result from their conduct, whether that be an act or failure to act.

In some circumstances, it may be very clear that there has been a breach of duty of care, such as where employees are not given protective eyewear when welding or if a machine is not fitted with a proper guard and so on, however there are other less obvious situations where a court may also find an employer has breached their duty of care, like where an employer has failed to supervise their employees to ensure safe work guidelines are being properly implemented.

And finally, the injury must be a result of the employers failure to meet the obligations of their duty of care. It is not enough to show there was an act or omission by an employer and that there was a workplace injury. The act or omission must have caused or materially contributed to the workplace injury. It is very important that evidence and symptoms also support your claim for damages.

A workplace injury is not limited to simply physical symptoms on the employee, but may include psychiatric injury or the aggravation of a pre-existing injury or condition, such as the quickened onset of symptoms of degenerative osteoarthritis; in this situation however, only the work related component will be compensated for at common law.

Further, a court will also consider the extent to which your own actions contributed to the injury, and will deduct a percentage from your damages lump sum accordingly. This is referred to as ‘contributory negligence’.

For more information regarding Employer Negligence

As the grounds for employer negligence contain inherently legal questions, it is always best to seek the advice of a workplace personal injury lawyer before commencing your claim. If you would like to discuss employer negligence or anything related to workplace injury, contact our offices for a free consultation with one of our workplace personal injury lawyers on (07) 3252 0011 or through our general inquiry page.

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

Terms & Conditions

Law Experts content including responses to your questions and comments provides legal information, tips and hints. The content on this site is not legal advice. That’s good, because there’s no risk of getting a bill by making a comment, asking a question or just contacting us.

You agree that any comment or question that you may ask may be published on this site, after editorial review, for the benefit of future readers. Our editors may edit comments in their discretion. For example we will would seek to remove information that would identify you.

The Corney & Lind lawyers (law experts) are of course happy to give legal advice, that’s what they do for a living. However it is only legal advice when you have engaged Corney & Lind Lawyers to provide legal advice for you. Before you do that you want to have an idea of what it might cost and our lawyers are happy to communicate with you about this.

We may change any of these terms and conditions at any time in our discretion by changing them on this page.

You must scroll down the terms & conditions before you can agree.

Previous post:

Next post: