<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Law Experts &#187; Litigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawexperts.com.au/c/litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawexperts.com.au</link>
	<description>Expert lawyers from Corney &#38; Lind Lawyers blog about real legal questions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:37:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>COMMERCIAL LITIGATION UPDATE &#8211; COURT ORDERS ALLPHONE TO PAY $3 MILLION IN DAMAGES TO FRANCHISEES</title>
		<link>http://www.lawexperts.com.au/litigation/commercial-litigation-update-court-orders-allphone-to-pay-3-million-in-damages-to-franchisees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawexperts.com.au/litigation/commercial-litigation-update-court-orders-allphone-to-pay-3-million-in-damages-to-franchisees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Cheng</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dispute Resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawexperts.com.au/?p=360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In April 2010, the Federal Court of  Australia declared that since 2004 Allphones engaged in misleading and  misleading and deceptive conduct, breached the Franchising Code of Conduct and  engaged in unconscionable conduct in its dealings with its former and current  franchisees.  Amongst other allegations, Allphones made deductions from  commission payments [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>In April 2010, the Federal Court of  Australia declared that since 2004 Allphones engaged in misleading and  misleading<img style="float: right;" src="http://www.corneyandlind.com.au/UserFiles/Image/SBM-011.jpg" alt="Dave" width="120" height="181" /> and deceptive conduct, breached the Franchising Code of Conduct and  engaged in unconscionable conduct in its dealings with its former and current  franchisees.  Amongst other allegations, Allphones made deductions from  commission payments meant for franchisees in breach of franchise  agreements.</p>
<p>The Court found and ordered  that:</p>
<ul>
<li>the franchisees  be paid $3 million in damages for money that had been  withheld;</li>
<li>3 Allphones  executives had been knowingly concerned in unconscionable  conduct;</li>
<li>a number of  injunctions be imposed to prevent similar conduct in the future;  and</li>
<li>Allphones and its  executives pay the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) costs  of legal proceedings.</li>
</ul>
<p>If your franchisor is not meeting  its obligations under the franchise agreement, acting inconsistently with the  Franchising Code of Conduct or not living up to its promises to you, we suggest  you should check the terms of your agreements and raise your concerns  accordingly.  Keep communications in writing as much as possible and good diary  notes. If issues cannot be resolved in the first instance between you and the  franchisor directly, promptly seek assistance from professional advisors or the  relevant industry bodies. By taking these steps it could make a significant  difference to your prospects of success in resolving  dispute.</p>
<p>Our  <a href="http://www.corneyandlind.com.au/services/dispute-resolution-litigation"><strong>Dispute Resolution</strong> <strong>&amp;  Litigation</strong></a> team at <a href="http://www.corneyandlind.com.au"><strong>Corney &amp; Lind  Lawyers</strong></a> can assist you, whether as franchisee or franchisor, as you  navigate legal issues on your franchise journey. Our (dispute resolution  &amp; litigation)  lawyers have the in-depth experience and knowledge to guide you through this  complex area of law.  If we can be of assistance, we would like to hear from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawexperts.com.au/litigation/commercial-litigation-update-court-orders-allphone-to-pay-3-million-in-damages-to-franchisees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Off-the-Plan Contracts &#8211; termination rights and risks</title>
		<link>http://www.lawexperts.com.au/conveyancing/off-the-plan-contracts-termination-rights-and-risks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawexperts.com.au/conveyancing/off-the-plan-contracts-termination-rights-and-risks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Lind</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conveyancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawexperts.com.au/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our property lawyers and litigation lawyers have just added an article to our Legal Resource Centre titled &#8211; Off-the-Plan Contracts &#8211; Termination rights and risks.
This article reports on a recent Qld case where non-compliance with the Body Corporate &#38; Community Management Act 1997 (Qld) provided a basis for termination of the contract by the Buyer.
This [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Our property lawyers and litigation lawyers have just added an article to our Legal Resource Centre titled &#8211; <a href="http://www.corneyandlind.com.au/resource-centre/property/buying_and_selling_units_off_the_plan">Off-the-Plan Contracts &#8211; Termination rights and risks</a>.</p>
<p>This article reports on a recent Qld case where non-compliance with the Body Corporate &amp; Community Management Act 1997 (Qld) provided a basis for termination of the contract by the Buyer.</p>
<p>This article is essential reading for all those who may be contemplating terminating an off-the-plan contract.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.corneyandlind.com.au/resource-centre/property/buying_and_selling_units_off_the_plan">Go to the Article &#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawexperts.com.au/conveyancing/off-the-plan-contracts-termination-rights-and-risks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creditor&#8217;s Statutory Demands</title>
		<link>http://www.lawexperts.com.au/litigation/creditors-statutory-demands/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawexperts.com.au/litigation/creditors-statutory-demands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 07:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Donovan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawexperts.com.au/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nathan Donovan is part of our Brisbane Lawyers team and focuses on litigation



Nathan Donovan

I recently wrote two articles for the Corney &#38; Lind Legal Resource Centre which are becoming increasing relevant in the current climate when more insolvency events are occurring:
Debt Recovery &#8211; Creditor&#8217;s Statutory Demand
Creditor&#8217;s Statutory Demands and the Australian Taxation Office
Have a look.
My [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong><em>Nathan Donovan is part of our </em></strong><a href="http://www.corneyandlind.com.au"><strong><em>Brisbane Lawyers</em></strong></a><strong><em> team and focuses on </em></strong><a href="http://www.corneyandlind.com.au/services/dispute-resolution-litigation"><strong><em>litigation</em></strong></a></p>
<div class="mceTemp">
<dl class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 130px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img title="Nathan Donovan" src="http://www.corneyandlind.com.au/UserFiles/Image/Nathan120.jpg" alt="Nathan Donovan" width="120" height="181" /></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd">Nathan Donovan</dd>
</dl>
<p>I recently wrote two articles for the Corney &amp; Lind <a href="http://www.corneyandlind.com.au/resource-centre">Legal Resource Centre</a> which are becoming increasing relevant in the current climate when more insolvency events are occurring:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.corneyandlind.com.au/resource-centre/litigation/debt-recovery">Debt Recovery &#8211; Creditor&#8217;s Statutory Demand</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.corneyandlind.com.au/resource-centre/litigation/Statutory_Demands_and_the_ATO">Creditor&#8217;s Statutory Demands and the Australian Taxation Office</a></div>
<div class="mceTemp">Have a look.</div>
<div class="mceTemp">My contact details are on the articles. Feel free to drop me a note or give me a call with any comments or questions. Or leave a comment below.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawexperts.com.au/litigation/creditors-statutory-demands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
